Scaling into a loosing position
I think people are having far too rigid opinions here. Also people automatically assume that scaling/averaging down means something that it does not necessarely mean i.e. the kind of action that the starter of the thread described.
If done as a part of a good trading plan which definately has a stop loss point and good money management (neither of which the thread starter seemed to have) scaling in when price moves against you is a very viable option when doing fade trades and does not increase risk at all.
In my trading when doing fade trades (by which I mean fading the most immediate price action) I sometimes scale in. I have a “price window” of x ticks inside of which I do the scaling and a definite stop loss few ticks outside the price window. So if I trade for example 3 lots I take the 3 lots at 3 different prices one lot at the time as the price moves against my position inside the price window instead of taking 3 lots at one price, such as at the midle of the window.
There is no more risk in this compared to taking the whole lot at a single price.
I think the key differences are: Having a definite stop loss and not exceeding your intended trade size (i.e. you scale INTO your intended size, you dont “average” a trade that allready is at your intended size).
————————-
I agree with Albert. If you still believe you want to average into a position it would be in your best interest to become a systematic trader. You could still use your discretion to pick your entry time/point. Then you must allow your ats(automatic trading system) to take over. I believe this is the only way you will not self destruct.
http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=53116&perpage=6&pagenumber=1
Time frame is everything - Protecting Your FX Capital Why Large Winning percentages are a bad measure for trading systems